DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Chester Rod & Gun Club, Inc. v. Town of Chester, 883 A.2d 1034.

22 citing documents.

  • New Hampshire Alpha of SAE Trust v. Town of Hanover 207 A.3d 219 N.H. 2019
    See, e.g., Chester Rod & Gun Club v. Town of Chester, 152 N.H. 577, 583 (2005).
  • Walter Donovan v. Town of Piermont N.H. 2016
    Chester Rod & Gun Club v. Town of Chester, 152 N.H. 577, 583 (2005).
  • Merriam Farm, Inc. v. Town of Surry 125 A.3d 362 N.H. 2015
    RSA 674:33 (Supp. 2014); see also Chester Rod & Gun Club v. Town of Chester, 152 N.H. 577, 583-84 (2005) (remanding to ZBA to determine, in first instance, whether requirements necessary for grant of variance were met and determining that trial court erred, in part, by ordering ZBA to grant variance where ZBA had made no findings as to certain variance requirements).
  • Hannaford Bros. v. Town of Bedford 64 A.3d 951 N.H. 2013
    The petitioner argues that “because this comparison occurred in the context of the ‘spirit of the ordinance’ ” analysis (rather than the “unnecessary hardship” analysis based upon the property’s unique physical conditions, see Chester Rod & Gun Club v. Town of Chester, 152 N.H. 577, 580 (2005)), the ZBA created a policy-setting and precedential interpretation that “will form the basis of future determinations about variances from the 40,000 square foot requirement,” thereby limiting the peti
  • Bartlett v. City of Manchester 62 A.3d 855 N.H. 2013
    Chester Rod and Gun Club v. Town of Chester, 152 N.H. 577, 583 (2005) (“When reviewing a decision of a zoning board of adjustment, the superior court acts as an appellate body, not as a fact finder”).
  • Brandt Development Co. v. City of Somersworth 34 A.3d 593 N.H. 2011
    Chester Rod & Gun Club v. Town of Chester, 152 N.H. 577, 580 (2005).
  • Harborside Associates, L.P. v. Parade Residence Hotel, LLC 34 A.3d 584 N.H. 2011
    Chester Rod & Gun Club v. Town of Chester, 152 N.H. 577, 581 (2005).
  • Saunders v. Town of Kingston 8 A.3d 89 N.H. 2010
    Chester Rod & Gun Club v. Town of Chester, 152 N.H. 577, 580 (2005) (quotation, citations and brackets omitted).
  • Farrar v. City of Keene 973 A.2d 326 N.H. 2009
    Chester Rod & Gun Club v. Town of Chester, 152 N.H. 577, 580 (2005).
  • Auger v. TOWN OF STRAFFORD 972 A.2d 1066 N.H. 2009
    Chester Rod & Gun Club v. Town of Chester, 152 N.H. 577, 583 (2005) (concerning appeal from the zoning board of adjustment).
  • Continental Paving, Inc. v. Town of Litchfield 969 A.2d 467 N.H. 2009
    Chester Rod & Gun Club v. Town of Chester, 152 N.H. 577, 580 (2005) (quotation, citation and brackets omitted).
  • Taylor v. Town of Wakefield 959 A.2d 217 N.H. 2008
    Chester Rod & Gun Club v. Town of Chester, 152 N.H. 577, 580 (2005).
  • Guy v. Town of Temple 956 A.2d 272 N.H. 2008
    Chester Rod & Gun Club v. Town of Chester, 152 N.H. 577, 580 (2005).
  • NINE A, LLC v. Town of Chesterfield 950 A.2d 197 N.H. 2008
    The requirement that the variance not be “contrary to the public interest” is “related to the requirement that the variance be consistent with the spirit of the ordinance.” Chester Rod & Gun Club v. Town of Chester, 152 N.H. 577, 580 (2005).
  • Severance v. Town of Epsom 923 A.2d 1057 N.H. 2007
    Chester Rod & Gun Club v. Town of Chester, 152 N.H. 577, 580 (2005).
  • Kalil v. Town of Dummer Zoning Board of Adjustment 922 A.2d 672 N.H. 2007
    The plaintiffs, citing Vigeant v. Town of Hudson, 151 N.H. 747, 750-51 (2005), contend both that the superior court erred by failing to review the evidence in the record and that we should overrule our decisions in Chester Rod & Gun Club v. Town of Chester, 152 N.H. 577, 583 (2005), and Lone Pine Hunters’ Club v. Town of Hollis, 149 N.H. 668, 670-71 (2003), to the extent that those cases hold “that superior courts are precluded from weighing the evidence.” We disagree.
  • Kalil v. TOWN OF DUMMER ZONING BD. 922 A.2d 672 N.H. 2007
    The plaintiffs, citing Vigeant v. Town of Hudson, 151 N.H. 747, 750-51, 867 A.2d 459 (2005), contend both that the superior court erred by failing to review the evidence in the record and that we should overrule our decisions in Chester Rod & Gun Club v. Town of Chester, 152 N.H. 577, 583, 883 A.2d 1034 (2005), and Lone Pine Hunters' Club v. Town of Hollis, 149 N.H. 668, 670-71, 826 A.2d 582 (2003), to the extent that those cases hold "that superior courts are precluded from weighing the evi
  • Malachy Glen Associates, Inc. v. Town of Chichester 920 A.2d 1192 N.H. 2007
    Chester Rod & Gun Club v. Town of Chester, 152 N.H. 577, 583 (2005).
  • Blagbrough Family Realty Trust v. a & T Forest Products, Inc. 917 A.2d 1221 N.H. 2007
    Chester Rod & Gun Club v. Town of Chester, 152 N.H. 577, 580 (2005).
  • Community Resources for Justice, Inc. v. City of Manchester 917 A.2d 707 N.H. 2007
    “It may set aside a ZBA decision if it finds by the balance of probabilities, based on the evidence before it, that the ZBA’s decision was unreasonable.” Chester Rod & Gun Club v. Town of Chester, 152 N.H. 577, 580 (2005) (quotation and brackets omitted).
  • Robinson v. Town of Hudson 914 A.2d 239 N.H. 2006
    Chester Rod & Gun Club v. Town of Chester, 152 N.H. 577, 580 (2005).
  • Greenland Conservation Commission v. New Hampshire Wetlands Council 913 A.2d 776 N.H. 2006
    Chester Rod & Gun Club v. Town of Chester, 152 N.H. 577, 583-84 (2005).