DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Weare Land Use Ass'n v. Town of Weare, 899 A.2d 255.

17 citing documents.

  • Richard Holt & a. v. Gary Keer & a. Gary Keer & a. v. Richard Holt & a. 167 N.H. 232 N.H. 2015
    Weare Land Use Ass’n v. Town of Weare, 153 N.H. 510, 511-12 (2006) (“The legislature will not be presumed to pass an act leading to an absurd result and nullifying, to an appreciable extent, the purpose of the statute.”).
  • Appeal of Wilson 20 A.3d 1006 N.H. 2011
    v. Town of Weare, 153 N.H. 510, 511-12 (2006) (“The legislature will not be presumed to pass an act leading to an absurd result and nullifying, to an appreciable extent, the purpose of the statute.”); Appeal of Barry, 142 N.H. 284, 287 (1997) (we will not interpret a statute so as to render it meaningless).
  • Appeal of Johnson 13 A.3d 315 N.H. 2011
    v. Town of Weare, 153 N.H. 510, 511-12 (2006) (“The legislature will not be presumed to pass an act leading to an absurd result and nullifying, to an appreciable extent, the purpose of the statute.”).
  • Ferson-Lake, LLC v. City of Nashua 986 A.2d 476 N.H. 2009
    v. Town of Weave, 153 N.H. 510, 511-12 (2006) (“The legislature will not be presumed to pass an act leading to an absurd result and nullifying, to an appreciable extent, the purpose of the statute.”).
  • Garand v. Town of Exeter 977 A.2d 540 N.H. 2009
    v. Town of Weare, 153 N.H. 510, 511 (2006) (noting that we “will not examine legislative history unless the statutory language is ambiguous”).
  • State v. McMillan 973 A.2d 287 N.H. 2009
    v. Town of Weare, 153 N.H. 510, 511-13 (2006) (legislature will not be presumed to enact legislation “nullifying, to an appreciable extent, the purpose of the statute”).
  • Lakeside Lodge, Inc. v. Town of New London 960 A.2d 1268 N.H. 2008
  • Great Traditions Home Builders, Inc. v. O'Connor 949 A.2d 724 N.H. 2008
    It is well settled in our jurisprudence that “[t]he legislature will not be presumed to pass an act leading to an absurd result and nullifying, to an appreciable extent, the purpose of the statute.” Weare Land Use Assoc.
  • Green Crow Corp. v. Town of New Ipswich 950 A.2d 163 N.H. 2008
    v. Town of Weare, 153 N.H. 510, 511-12 (2006) (citations omitted).
  • Churchill Realty Trust v. City of Dover Zoning Board of Adjustment 941 A.2d 584 N.H. 2008
    v. Town of Weare, 153 N.H. 510, 511-12 (2006), we reject the respondent’s construction.
  • Joyce v. Town of Weare 937 A.2d 919 N.H. 2007
    or any other major subdivision applications creating a total of more than 3 lots.” Weare Land Use Assoc.
  • In Re Carr 938 A.2d 89 N.H. 2007
  • Farm Family Casualty Insurance v. Town of Rollinsford 927 A.2d 1234 N.H. 2007
    v. Town of Weare, 153 N.H. 510, 511-12 (2006) (“The legislature will not be presumed to pass an act...
  • State v. Polk 927 A.2d 514 N.H. 2007
    v. Town of Weare, 153 N.H. 510, 511-12 (2006) (legislature will not be presumed to enact legislation “nullifying, to an appreciable extent, the purpose of the statute”).
  • Appeal of Malouin 926 A.2d 295 N.H. 2007
    v. Town of Weare, 153 N.H. 510, 511 (2006) (“The legislature will not be presumed to pass an act leading to an absurd result.”); N.H. Motor Transport, 154 N.H. at 625 (‘When construing a statute, we...
  • In Re Christopher K. 923 A.2d 187 N.H. 2007
    v. Town of Weare, 153 N.H. 510, 511-12 (2006) (legislature will not be presumed to enact legislation “nullifying, to an appreciable extent, the purpose of the statute”); cf. In re Guardianship of E.L., 154 N.H. 292, 301 (2006) (requiring guardian to prove continued incapacity of ward solely upon acts, occurrences or statements within six months of
  • Community Resources for Justice, Inc. v. City of Manchester 917 A.2d 707 N.H. 2007