DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Town of Hinsdale v. Town of Chesterfield, 889 A.2d 32.

16 citing documents.

  • State of New Hampshire v. Shane M. Beattie & a. N.H. 2020
    Because “[s]tandards of review are procedural in nature,” Town of Hinsdale v. Town of Chesterfield, 153 N.H. 70, 74 (2005) (citing Alison H. v. Byard, 163 F.3d 2, 4 (1st Cir. 1998)); see also Merrill v. City of Manchester, 124 N.H. 8, 15 (1983) (explaining that the standard of review is a procedural safeguard necessary to protect landowners’ fundamental rights), as a matter of procedure, the standard of review is governed by RS
  • Bellevue Properties, Inc. v. Town of Conway & a. N.H. 2020
    First, it argues that the trial court applied an incorrect legal standard to evaluate the decision to discontinue McMillan Lane — specifically, that the trial court utilized a balancing test that was inconsistent with the balancing test we set forth in Town of Hinsdale v. Town of Chesterfield, 153 N.H. 70, 73-74 (2005).
  • Appeal of Annelie Mullen 169 N.H. 392 N.H. 2016
    Town of Hinsdale v. Town of Chesterfield, 153 N.H. 70, 73 (2005) (“De novo review means that the reviewing [authority] decides the matter anew, neither restricted by nor deferring to decisions made below.”).
  • Houston Holdings, LLC v. City of Portsmouth 78 A.3d 522 N.H. 2013
    Town of Hinsdale v. Town of Chesterfield, 153 N.H. 70, 73 (2005); In re Juvenile 2002-511-A, 149 N.H. 592, 594 (2003).
  • Deyeso v. Cavadi 66 A.3d 1236 N.H. 2013
    See, e.g., Town of Hinsdale v. Town of Chesterfield, 153 N.H. 70, 72 (2005).
  • City of Concord v. State 164 N.H. 130 N.H. 2012
    See, e.g., Town of Hinsdale v. Town of Chesterfield, 153 N.H. 70 (2005).
  • Ouellette v. Town of Kingston 956 A.2d 286 N.H. 2008
    Town of Hinsdale v. Town of Chesterfield, 153 N.H. 70, 73 (2005) (“De novo review means that the reviewing [body] decides the matter anew, neither restricted by nor deferring to decisions made below.”).
  • Green Crow Corp. v. Town of New Ipswich 950 A.2d 163 N.H. 2008
    “Our goal is to apply statutes in light of the legislature’s intent in enacting them, and in light of the policy sought to be advanced by the entire statutory scheme.” Town of Hinsdale v. Town of Chesterfield, 153 N.H. 70, 73 (2005) (quotation omitted).
  • State v. Offen 938 A.2d 879 N.H. 2007
    State v. Arsenault, 153 N.H. 413, 415 (2006); Town of Hinsdale v. Town of Chesterfield, 153 N.H. 70, 72 (2005).
  • Babiarz v. Town of Grafton 930 A.2d 395 N.H. 2007
    Town of Hinsdale v. Town of Chesterfield, 153 N.H. 70, 72 (2005).
  • Appeal of City of Nashua 924 A.2d 418 N.H. 2007
    Town of Hinsdale v. Town of Chesterfield, 153 N.H. 70, 72 (2005).
  • State v. Drake 921 A.2d 403 N.H. 2007
    Town of Hinsdale v. Town of Chesterfield, 153 N.H. 70, 73 (2005).
  • Chase v. Ameriquest Mortgage Co. 921 A.2d 369 N.H. 2007
    See, e.g., Town of Hinsdale v. Town of Chesterfield, 153 N.H. 70, 72 (2005).
  • Eldertrust of Florida, Inc. v. Town of Epsom 919 A.2d 776 N.H. 2007
    See, e.g., Town of Hinsdale v. Town of Chesterfield, 153 N.H. 70, 72 (2005); see also Hattiesburg Area Senior Servs., Inc. v. Lamar County, 633 So.
  • State v. Huffman 918 A.2d 1279 N.H. 2007
    Town of Hinsdale v. Town of Chesterfield, 153 N.H. 70, 72 (2005).
  • Appeal of Francis Lorette 910 A.2d 1155 N.H. 2006
    Town of Hinsdale v. Town of Chesterfield, 153 N.H. 70, 72 (2005).