Cited by

DHB v. Town of Pembroke, 152 N.H. 314, 317 (2005).

r of law when it determined that Kymalimi’s site plan application was incomplete because DSM had not provided written permission.” At the outset, the trial court determined that although “this matter should have been presented to the Court via a petition for writ of certiorari, the Court nevertheless concludes that it may properly consider the merits of this dispute.” See DHB v. Town of Pembroke, 152 N.H. 314, 318 (2005) (“Though the plaintiff’s petition did not seek a writ of certiorari, courts

DHB v. Town of Pembroke, 152 N.H. 314, 317-18 (2005) (holding that review on certiorari was available to review a planning board’s decision not to accept a subdivision application).

Petition of Kalar, 162 N.H. 314, 321, 27 A.3d 756 (2011); DHB v. Town of Pembroke, 152 N.H. 314, 321, 876 A.2d 206 (2005).

DHB v. Town of Pembroke, 152 N.H. 314, 318 (2005) (allowing appellate review by writ of certiorari of planning board’s decision not to accept an application).

RSA 676:4, I(c)(1); see DHB v. Town of Pembroke, 152 N.H. 314, 318 (2005) (“A planning board cannot consider whether to approve an application before it accepts that application as complete.”).

We, in turn, will uphold the trial *758 court’s order unless it is unsupported by the record or legally erroneous, see id., looking to whether a reasonable person could have reached the same decision as did the trial court based upon the same evidence, see DHB v. Town of Pembroke, 152 N.H. 314, 319-20 (2005).

As a rule of statutory construction, “[a]n ‘administrative gloss’ is placed upon an ambiguous clause when those responsible for its implementation interpret the clause in a consistent manner and apply it to similarly situated applicants over a period of years without legislative interference.” DHB, Inc. v. Town of Pembroke, 152 N.H. 314, 321 (2005).

DHB v. Town of Pembroke, 152 N.H. 314, 321 (2005).

DHB v. Town of Pembroke, 152 N.H. 314, 321 (2005) (“ ‘[Ajdministrative gloss’ is placed upon an ambiguous clause when those responsible for its implementation interpret the clause in a consistent manner and apply it to similarly situated applicants over a period of years without legislative interference.

Relying upon DHB v. Town of Pembroke, 152 N.H. 314, 318 (2005), Collden highlights the language “voted to approve or disapprove the application” in RSA 677:15, I, contending that the statute is inapplicable because the planning board had already approved its application in 1993.

DHB v. Town of Pembroke, 152 N.H. 314, 321 (2005).

DHB v. Town of Pembroke, 152 N.H. 314, 319, 876 A.2d 206 (2005).

DHB v. Town of Pembroke, 152 N.H. 314, 319 (2005).

DHB v. Town of Pembroke, 152 N.H. 314, 323 (2005).