DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Van Der Stok v. Van Voorhees, 866 A.2d 972.

20 citing documents.

  • Lois Stearns & a. v. Town of Gorham & a. N.H. 2025
    Arcidi v. Town of Rye, 150 N.H. 694, 704 (2004) (attorney’s fees); Van Der Stok v. Van Voorhees, 151 N.H. 679, 686 (2005) (costs).
  • Mary Feeney v. Karyn Kelley N.H. 2023
    Jesurum v. WBTSCC Ltd. P’ship, 169 N.H. 469, 482 (2016) (holding that defendants’ appeal of the trial court’s order on the merits prior to the trial court’s ruling on the plaintiff’s timely motion to reconsider the denial of attorney’s fees was premature); Van Der Stok v. Van Voorhees, 151 N.H. 679, 681 (2005) (holding that appealing party properly waited to file appeal until after trial court issued ruling on attorney’s fees, rather than to appeal its earlier denial of motions for judgment notw
  • City of Laconia v. Robert Kjellander N.H. 2023
    Van Der Stok v. Van Voorhees, 151 N.H. 679, 685 (2005) (“Where a party prevails on some claims and not others, and the successful and unsuccessful claims are analytically severable, any fee award should be reduced to exclude time spent on unsuccessful claims.” (quotation omitted)).
  • Town of Henniker v. Andre Cote, Jr. N.H. 2023
    Van Der Stok v. Van Voorhees, 151 N.H. 679, 681 (2005) (holding that appellant properly waited to file appeal until the trial court had issued a post-trial final ruling on attorney’s fees); see also Mortgage Specialists v. Davey, 153 N.H. 764, 786 (2006) (holding that party may preserve issue that could have been raised at earlier time by raising it in a motio
  • Marcella Paul-Roc & a. v. Matthew Demio N.H. 2020
    Jesurum v. WBTSCC Ltd. P’ship, 169 N.H. 469, 482 (2016) (holding that, because defendants filed appeal before trial court had ruled on motion for reconsideration of denial of attorney’s fees, appeal was premature and trial court had jurisdiction to rule on motion notwithstanding appeal); cf. Van Der Stok v. Van Voorhees, 151 N.H. 679, 681 (2005) (holding that plaintiff properly waited for all issues in case, including request for attorney’s fees, to be finally decided before taking appeal).
  • Gerry Beique v. Brandon Holm, Trustee of the Holm Family Revocable Trust of 2006 & a. N.H. 2019
    Ct. R. 3 (defining “decision on the merits”); Van Der Stok v. Van Voorhees, 151 N.H. 679, 681 (2005) (final ruling on attorney’s fees concludes the proceeding).
  • Baxter Lake Recreation Area Association v. Thomas Connelly N.H. 2019
    “Where a party prevails on some claims and not others, and the successful and unsuccessful claims are analytically severable, any fee award should be reduced to exclude time spent on unsuccessful claims.” Van Der Stok v. Van Voorhees, 151 N.H. 679, 685 (2005) (quotation omitted).
  • Mark Keenan v. Karen Tuthill & a. N.H. 2018
    “We review the trial court’s award of attorney’s fees under an unsustainable exercise of discretion standard, giving deference to the trial court’s decision.” Van Der Stok v. Van Voorhees, 151 N.H. 679, 683 (2005) (quotation omitted).
  • Robert Jesurum v. WBTSCC Limited Partnership & a. 151 A.3d 949 N.H. 2016
    Ct. R. 8 (pertaining to an interlocutory appeal from ruling); cf. Van Der Stok v. Van Voorhees, 151 N.H. 679, 681 (2005) (holding that the plaintiff properly waited for all issues in the case, including a request for attorney’s fees, to be finally decided before taking an appeal).
  • Brentwood Distribution, LLC v. Town of Exeter N.H. 2016
    Van Der Stok v. Van Voorhees, 151 N.H. 679, 681 (2005) (agreeing that appeal of merits ruling was timely when plaintiff “properly waited for a final ruling on attorney’s fees before filing his notice of appeal”); see also Sup.
  • In the Matter of James Hatzos and Lisa Hatzos N.H. 2016
    See, e.g., Shelton v. Tamposi, 164 N.H. 490, 495 (2013); Van Der Stok v. Van Voorhees, 151 N.H. 679, 681 (2005).
  • Appeal of the Local Government Center, Inc. & a . 85 A.3d 388 N.H. 2014
    “Where a party prevails on some claims and not others, and the successful and unsuccessful claims are analytically severable, any fee award should be reduced to exclude time spent on unsuccessful claims.” Van der Stok v. Van Voorhees, 151 N.H. 679, 685 (2005) (quotation omitted).
  • Town of Carroll v. Rines 62 A.3d 733 N.H. 2013
    Van Der Stok v. Van Voorhees, 151 N.H. 679, 685 (2005) (where party prevails on some claims and not others, and where unsuccessful claims are analytically severable, any fee award should be reduced to exclude time spent on unsuccessful claims).
  • Shelton v. Tamposi 62 A.3d 741 N.H. 2013
    Van der Stok v. Van Voorhees, 151 N.H. 679, 681 (2005).
  • Koor Communications, Inc. v. City of Lebanon 929 A.2d 593 N.H. 2007
    “We review the trial court’s award of attorney’s fees under an unsustainable exercise of discretion standard, giving deference to the trial court’s decision.” Van Der Stok v. Van Voorhees, 151 N.H. 679, 683 (2005) (quotation omitted).
  • J.G.M.C.J. Corp. v. C.L.A.S.S., Inc. 924 A.2d 400 N.H. 2007
    at 238-39; see also Van Der Stok v. Van Voorhees, 151 N.H. 679, 681-82 (2005).
  • Porter v. City of Manchester 921 A.2d 393 N.H. 2007
    Van Der Stok v. Van Voorhees, 151 N.H. 679, 681 (2005).
  • LAMONTAGNE BUILDERS, INC. v. Brooks 910 A.2d 1162 N.H. 2006
    Van Der Stok v. Van Voorhees, 151 N.H. 679, 683 (2005).
  • Stewart v. Bader 907 A.2d 931 N.H. 2006
    Van Der Stok v. Van Voorhees, 151 N.H. 679, 681 (2005).
  • Simpson v. Young 899 A.2d 216 N.H. 2006
    Van Der Stock v. Van Voorhees, 151 N.H. 679, 685 (2005).