DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite State v. Fischer, 876 A.2d 232.

13 citing documents.

  • Petition of State of New Hampshire N.H. 2022
    Petition of State of N.H. (State v. Fischer), 152 N.H. 205, 208 (2005) (superseded on other grounds by rule).
  • State v. Jeremy Surrell 189 A.3d 883 N.H. 2018
    “The legislature has vested in the trial court the power to adapt sentencing to best meet the constitutional objectives of punishment, rehabilitation and deterrence — within these parameters, the judge has broad discretion to assign different sentences, suspend sentence, or grant probation.” Petition of State of N.H. (State v. Fischer), 152 N.H. 205, 211 (2005), superseded by rule on other grounds as stated in State v. Mottola, 166 N.H. 173, 176 (2014).
  • University System of New Hampshire Board of Trustees & A. v. Marco Dorfsman & A 130 A.3d 1219 N.H. 2015
    Petition of State of N.H. (State v. Fischer), 152 N.H. 205, 210 (2005), superseded by rule on other grounds as stated in State v. Mottola, 166 N.H. 173, 176 (2014).
  • Petition of Steven J. Rubenzer, Ph.D., ABPP N.H. 2015
    Petition of State of N.H. (State v. Fischer), 152 N.H. 205, 208 (2005).
  • State of New Hampshire v. Arthur Mottola 90 A.3d 1234 N.H. 2014
    In arguing that “good cause” remains the standard, the defendant relies upon Petition of State of N.H. (State v. Fischer), 152 N.H. 205, 209 (2005), State v. Cotell, 143 N.H. 275, 278-79 (1998), and State v. Hayes, 138 N.H. 410, 411 (1994).
  • In re Southern New Hampshire Medical Center 55 A.3d 988 N.H. 2012
    Town of Atkinson v. Malborn Realty Trust, 164 N.H. 62, 69 (2012) (declining to address appellants’ procedural due process arguments because they were not raised first in the trial court); Petition of State of N.H. (State v. Fischer), 152 N.H. 205, 210 (2005) (“A case may lack ripeness...
  • Billewicz v. Ransmeier 13 A.3d 116 N.H. 2010
    Actions § 75, at 287 (2005); cf. Petition of State of N.H. (State v. Fischer), 152 N.H. 205, 210 (2005) (in determining ripeness, court evaluates fitness of issue for judicial determination and hardship to the parties if court declines to consider issue).
  • State v. Moran 965 A.2d 1024 N.H. 2009
    Petition of State of N.H. (State v. Fischer), 152 N.H. 205, 211-13 (2005) (discussing the different versions of RSA 651:20).
  • State v. Burgess 943 A.2d 727 N.H. 2008
    Petition of State of N.H. (State v. Fischer), 152 N.H. 205, 211 (2005).
  • Duquette v. Warden, New Hampshire State Prison 919 A.2d 767 N.H. 2007
    Similarly, “the legislature may circumscribe the court’s power to suspend [a sentence] to a greater or lesser degree, provided that the sentencing process as a whole complies with the requirements of due process and with other constitutional constraints.” Petition of State of N.H. (State v. Fischer), 152 N.H. 205,211 (2005).
  • DeBenedetto v. CLD Consulting Engineers, Inc. 903 A.2d 969 N.H. 2006
    Petition of State of N.H. (State v. Fischer), 152 N.H. 205, 211 (2005).
  • State v. Horner 893 A.2d 683 N.H. 2006
    Petition of State of N.H. (State v. Fischer), 152 N.H. 205, 211 (2005).
  • In re Berg 886 A.2d 980 N.H. 2005
    Petition of State of N.H. (State v. Fischer), 152 N.H. 205, 210 (2005).