Cited by

v. Town of Tilton, 151 N.H. 75, 78 (2004) (quotation omitted).

v. Town of Tilton, 151 N.H. 75, 78 (2004) (observing that site plan review is “designed to assure that sites will be developed in a safe and attractive manner and in a way that will not involve danger or injury to the health, safety, or prosperity of abutting property owners or the general public” (quotation omitted)).

“The appealing party bears the burden of persuading the trial court that, by the balance of probabilities, the board’s decision was unreasonable.” Summa Humma Enters.

v. Town of Tilton, 151 N.H. 75, 78 (2004) (quoting 15 P. Loughlin, New Hampshire Practice, Land Use Planning and Zoning § 30.01, at 425 (2000)).

v. Town of Tilton, 151 N.H. 75, 78 (2004) (discussing the purpose of site plan review).

v. Town of Tilton, 151 N.H. 75, 78 (2004) (quotation omitted), we have recognized that site plan review is not merely a “mechanical exercise” of implementing the “specific limitations imposed by ordinances and statutes.” Id.

Summa Humma Enters, v. Town of Tilton, 151 N.H. 75, 79 (2004).

We will uphold its decision on appeal unless it is unsupported by the evidence or legally erroneous.” Ferson-Lake, LLC v. City of Nashua, 159 N.H. 524, 526 (2009) (citations omitted); see also Summa Humma Enters.

v. Town of Tilton, 151 N.H. 75, 78 (2004) (whether the proposed use is an appropriate use of land is a zoning question).

Summa Humma Enters, v. Town of Tilton, 151 N.H. 75, 79 (2004).

v. Town of Tilton, 151 N.H. 75, 79 (2004) (planning board).