DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Estate of Joshua T. v. State, 840 A.2d 768.

14 citing documents.

  • Rivas v. Ciecko 2026 N.H. 2 N.H. 2026
    Estate of Joshua T. v. State, 150 N.H. 405, 407 (2003).
  • Dean Strang & a. v. Christmas Island Resort Condominium Association & a. N.H. 2024
    Estate of Joshua T. v. State, 150 N.H. 405, 407 (2003).
  • Hardy v. Chester Arms, LLC 2024 N.H. 5 N.H. 2024
    Estate of Joshua T. v. State, 150 N.H. 405, 407-08 (2003) (describing proof of causation required for negligence claim); Dunbeck v. Exeter & Hampton Elec.
  • Brandon Stachulski v. Apple New England, LLC 191 A.3d 1231 N.H. 2018
    quired, we must determine whether this issue — whether the plaintiff’s pain and suffering from salmonella “will continue into the future” — is “within the realm of common knowledge and everyday experience” of the average layman, Laramie v. Stone, 160 N.H. 419, 427 (2010), or whether an expert opinion is needed to “preclude the jury from engaging in idle speculation,” Estate of Joshua T. v. State, 150 N.H. 405, 408 (2003) (quotation omitted).
  • Elaine Christen & a. v. Fiesta Shows, Inc. & a. 173 A.3d 162 N.H. 2017
    “We affirm a trial court’s decision if our review of the evidence discloses no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Estate of Joshua T. v. State, 150 N.H. 405, 407 (2003).
  • New Hampshire Fish & Game Department v. Bacon 116 A.3d 1060 N.H. 2015
    Estate of Joshua T. v. State, 150 N.H. 405, 408 (2003) (stating that to establish proximate cause a plaintiff must show “that the defendant’s conduct caused or contributed to cause the harm”).
  • Beckles v. Madden 993 A.2d 209 N.H. 2010
    “[L]egal cause requires a plaintiff to establish that the negligent conduct was a substantial factor in bringing about the harm.” Estate of Joshua T. v. State, 150 N.H. 405,408 (2003).
  • Kenison v. Dubois 879 A.2d 1161 N.H. 2005
    Estate of *450 Joshua T. v. State, 150 N.H. 405, 407 (2003).
  • Soraghan v. Mt. Cranmore Ski Resort, Inc. 881 A.2d 693 N.H. 2005
    Estate of Joshua T. v. State, 150 N.H. 405, 407 (2003).
  • Estate of Gordon-Couture v. Brown 876 A.2d 196 N.H. 2005
    Estate of Joshua T. v. State, 150 N.H. 405, 407 (2003).
  • Wilson v. Progressive Northern Insurance 868 A.2d 268 N.H. 2005
    Estate of Joshua T. v. State, 150 N.H. 405, 407 (2003).
  • White v. Asplundh Tree Expert Co. 864 A.2d 1101 N.H. 2004
    Estate of Joshua T. v. State, 150 N.H. 405, 407 (2003).
  • Richard v. Pembroke School District 859 A.2d 1157 N.H. 2004
    ‘When reviewing a trial court’s grant of summary judgment, we consider the affidavits and other evidence, and all inferences properly drawn from them, in the light most favorable to the non-moving party.” Estate of Joshua T. v. State, 150 N.H. 405, 407 (2003).
  • Carignan v. New Hampshire International Speedway, Inc. 858 A.2d 536 N.H. 2004
    “It is axiomatic that in order to prove actionable negligence, a plaintiff must establish that the defendant owed a duty to the plaintiff, breached that duty, and that the breach proximately caused the claimed injury.” Estate of Joshua T. v. State, 150 N.H. 405, 407 (2003).