DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Franklin Lodge v. Marcoux, 825 A.2d 480.

13 citing documents.

  • Curtis S. Ridlon v. New Hampshire Bureau of Securities Regulation N.H. 2019
    412, 420-21 (1987) (cautioning that the Seventh Amendment may require “trial by jury in actions unheard of at common law,” and noting that “characterizing the relief sought is more important than finding a precisely analogous common-law cause of action in determining whether the Seventh Amendment guarantees a jury trial” (quotation and brackets omitted)), with Franklin Lodge of Elks v. Marcoux, 149 N.H. 581, 592 (2003) (explaining that focusing solely upon the nature of damages “fails to address
  • U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission & A. v. Fred Fuller Oil Company, Inc. & A 134 A.3d 17 N.H. 2016
    Franklin Lodge of Elks v. Marcoux, 149 N.H. 581, 585 2 (2003).
  • Atwater v. Town of Plainfield 8 A.3d 159 N.H. 2010
    within the context of the statute as a whole,” in order to “better discern the legislature’s intent and to interpret statutory language in light of the policy or purpose sought to be advanced by the statutory scheme.” Franklin Lodge of Elks v. Marcoux, 149 N.H. 581, 585 (2003).
  • General Insulation Co. v. Eckman Construction 992 A.2d 613 N.H. 2010
    Franklin Lodge of Elks v. Marcoux, 149 N.H. 581, 585 (2003).
  • Hair Excitement, Inc. v. L'Oreal U.S.A., Inc. 965 A.2d 1032 N.H. 2009
    “To resolve whether a party has a right to trial by jury in a particular action, we generally look to both the nature of the case and the relief sought, and ascertain whether the customary practice included a trial by jury before 1784.” Franklin Lodge of Elks v. Marcoux, 149 N.H. 581, 591 (2003) (quotation and citation omitted).
  • Lassonde v. Stanton 956 A.2d 332 N.H. 2008
    Franklin Lodge of Elks v. Marcoux, 149 N.H. 581, 592 (2003).
  • Everitt v. General Electric Co. 932 A.2d 831 N.H. 2007
    This argument is also beyond the scope of the interlocutory appeal question, was asserted in a mere passing manner without further development, see Franklin Lodge of Elks v. Marcoux, 149 N.H. 581, 592 (2003), and was not raised below.
  • Blackthorne Group, Inc. v. Pines of Newmarket, Inc. 848 A.2d 725 N.H. 2004
    Franklin Lodge of Elks v. Marcoux, 149 N.H. 581, 585 (2003).
  • In re Jerome 843 A.2d 325 N.H. 2004
    Franklin Lodge of Elks v. Marcoux, 149 N.H. 581, 585 (2003).
  • Nilsson v. Bierman 839 A.2d 25 N.H. 2003
    Franklin Lodge of Elks v. Marcoux, 149 N.H. 581, 585 (2003).
  • New Hampshire Department of Health & Human Services v. Bonser 836 A.2d 761 N.H. 2003
    Franklin Lodge of Elks v. Marcoux, 149 N.H. 581, 585 (2003).
  • State v. Boulais 834 A.2d 380 N.H. 2003
    Franklin Lodge of Elks v. Marcoux, 149 N.H. 581, 585 (2003).
  • In re Juvenile 2003-189 834 A.2d 271 N.H. 2003
    Franklin Lodge of Elks v. Marcoux, 149 N.H. 581, 585 (2003).