Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Route 12 Books & Video v. Town of Troy, 825 A.2d 493.

15 citing documents.

  • Richard Anthony & a. v. Town of Plaistow N.H. 2023
    The effect is that “[w]hen a party is aggrieved by a planning board decision that interprets both planning regulations and zoning ordinances and wishes to appeal issues involving both, the party is obligated to file separate appeals with the superior court and the zoning board of adjustment.” Route 12 Books & Video v. Town of Troy, 149 N.H. 569, 576 (2003); see Hoffman v. Town of Gilford, 147 N.H. 85, 88-89 (2001).
  • Appeal of Sandra Brown, DVM 198 A.3d 276 N.H. 2018
    sanction a practitioner based on alleged 4 violations of the Controlled Drug Act.” Although the petitioner raised this argument for the first time in her second, untimely motion for rehearing, we address it because “the issue of subject matter jurisdiction may be raised at any time in the proceedings.” Route 12 Books & Video v. Town of Troy, 149 N.H. 569, 575 (2003).
  • Bosonetto v. Town of Richmond 48 A.3d 973 N.H. 2012
    *744 “[Subject matter] jurisdiction cannot be conferred where it does not already exist.” Route 12 Books & Video v. Town of Troy, 149 N.H. 569, 575 (2003).
  • Holloway Automotive Group v. Lucic 35 A.3d 577 N.H. 2011
    To the contrary, “the issue of subject matter jurisdiction may be raised at any time in the proceedings because jurisdiction cannot be conferred where it does not already exist.” Route 12 Books & Video v. Town of Troy, 149 N.H. 569, 575 (2003).
  • Gray v. Kelly 13 A.3d 848 N.H. 2010
    Route 12 Books & Video v. Town of Troy, 149 N.H. 569, 575 (2003).
  • Saunders v. Town of Kingston 8 A.3d 89 N.H. 2010
    “[W]hen a planning board decision is based upon both zoning and planning issues, a party aggrieved by both the zoning and planning aspects of that decision must follow the respective statutory procedures for appellate review of zoning and planning issues to preserve its rights.” Route 12 Books & Video v. Town of Troy, 149 N.H. 569, 573 (2003).
  • Motorsports Holdings, LLC v. Town of Tamworth 993 A.2d 189 N.H. 2010
    plication submitted to the planning board, the ground for such disapproval shall be adequately stated upon the records of the planning board.” This statutory requirement compels the planning board to “sufficiently apprise [an applicant] of the planning board’s reasoning and provide an adequate record of the board’s reasoning for us to review on appeal.” Route 12 Books & Video v. Town of Troy, 149 N.H. 569, 575 (2003).
  • State v. DEMESMIN 992 A.2d 569 N.H. 2010
    Route 12 Books & Video v. Town of Troy, 149 N.H. 569, 575 (2003).
  • Radziewicz v. Town of Hudson 982 A.2d 415 N.H. 2009
    In addition, “the issue of subject matter jurisdiction may be raised at any time in the proceedings because jurisdiction cannot be conferred where it does not already exist.” Route 12 Books & Video v. Town of Troy, 149 N.H. 569, 575 (2003).
  • PROPERTY PORTFOLIO GROUP v. Town of Derry 913 A.2d 750 N.H. 2007
    Route 12 Books & Video v. Town of Troy, 149 N.H. 569, 575, 825 A.2d 493 (2003).
  • Property Portfolio Group, LLC v. Town of Derry 913 A.2d 750 N.H. 2006
    Route 12 Books & Video v. Town of Troy, 149 N.H. 569, 575 (2003).
  • Harley-Davidson Motor Co. v. Seacoast Harley-Davidson, Inc. 877 A.2d 211 N.H. 2005
    Compare Beggs v. Reading Company, 103 N.H. 156, 158 (1961), with Route 12 Books & Video v. Town of Troy, 149 N.H. 569, 575 (2003).
  • Baines v. New Hampshire Senate President 876 A.2d 768 N.H. 2005
    Route 12 Books & Video v. Town of Troy, 149 N.H. 569, 575 (2003).
  • Hughes v. New Hampshire Division of Aeronautics 871 A.2d 18 N.H. 2005
    Asmussen v. Comm’r, N.H. Dep’t of Safety, 145 N.H. 578, 588 (2000); Route 12 Books & Video v. Town of Troy, 149 N.H. 569, 575 (2003).
  • State v. Hofland 857 A.2d 1271 N.H. 2004
    Route 12 Books & Video v. Town of Troy, 149 N.H. 569, 575 (2003) (issue of subject matter jurisdiction can be raised at any time in proceedings because it can be neither waived nor conferred where it does not already exist).