DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Jacobs v. Director, N.H. Division of Motor Vehicles, 823 A.2d 752.

21 citing documents.

  • Union Leader Corporation & a. v. Town of Salem N.H. 2020
    “The doctrine of stare decisis demands respect in a society governed by the rule of law, for when governing legal standards are open to revision in every case, deciding cases becomes a mere exercise of judicial will with arbitrary and unpredictable results.” Jacobs v. Director, N.H. Div. of Motor Vehicles, 149 N.H. 502, 504 (2003) (quotations omitted).
  • Robert Gormley & a. v. Rough Diamond Development, LLC & a. N.H. 2020
    Jacobs v. Director, N.H. Div. of Motor Vehicles, 149 N.H. 502, 504-06 (2003).
  • James Boyle, Individually and as Trustee of the 150 Greenleaf Avenue Realty Trust v. City of Portsmouth N.H. 2020
    “The doctrine of stare decisis demands respect in a society governed by the rule of law, for when governing legal standards are open to revision in every case, deciding cases becomes a mere exercise of judicial will with arbitrary and unpredictable results.” Jacobs v. Director, N.H. Div. of Motor Vehicles, 149 N.H. 502, 504 (2003) (quotation omitted).
  • Charles Hoegen v. Director, New Hampshire Division of Motor Vehicles N.H. 2015
    .” RSA 265-A:4; see Jacobs v. Director, N.H. Div. of Motor Vehicles, 149 N.H. 502, 506 (2003).
  • DuPont v. Nashua Police Department 113 A.3d 239 N.H. 2015
    Jacobs v. Director, N.H. Din of Motor Vehicles, 149 N.H. 502, 503 (2003) (review of superior court decision on appeal from an administrative license suspension by the department of motor vehicles).
  • Ford v. New Hampshire Department of Transportation 163 N.H. 284 N.H. 2012
    “The doctrine of stare decisis demands respect in a society governed by the rule of law, for when governing legal standards are open to revision in every case, deciding cases becomes a mere exercise of judicial will with arbitrary and unpredictable results.” Jacobs v. Director, N.H. Div. of Motor Vehicles, 149 N.H. 502, 504 (2003) (quotations omitted).
  • Ford v. NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPT. OF TRANSP. 37 A.3d 436 N.H. 2012
    Jacobs v. Director, N.H. Div. of Motor Vehicles, 149 N.H. 502, 504, 823 A.2d 752 (2003) (quotations omitted).
  • State v. Quintero 34 A.3d 612 N.H. 2011
    “The doctrine of stare decisis demands respect in a society governed by the rule of law, for when governing legal standards are open to revision in every case, deciding cases becomes a mere exercise of judicial will with arbitrary and unpredictable results.” Jacobs v. Director, N.H. Div. of Motor Vehicles, 149 N.H. 502, 504 (2003) (quotations omitted); see State v. Holmes, 154 N.H. 723, 724 (2007).
  • Ocasio v. Federal Express Corp. 33 A.3d 1139 N.H. 2011
    “The doctrine of stare decisis demands respect in a society governed by the rule of law, for when governing legal standards are open to revision in every case, deciding cases becomes a mere exercise of judicial will with arbitrary and unpredictable- results.” Jacobs v. Director, N.H. Div. of Motor Vehicles, 149 N.H. 502, 504 (2003) (quotations omitted).
  • Kalil v. Town of Dummer Zoning Board of Adjustment 159 N.H. 725 N.H. 2010
    “The doctrine of stare decisis demands respect in a society governed by the rule of law, for when governing legal standards are open to revision in every case, deciding cases becomes a mere exercise of judicial will with arbitrary and unpredictable results.” Jacobs v. Director, N.H. Div. of Motor Vehicles, 149 N.H. 502, 504 (2003) (quotations omitted).
  • Kalil v. TOWN OF DUMMER 992 A.2d 725 N.H. 2010
    Jacobs v. Director, N.H. Div. of Motor Vehicles, 149 N.H. 502, 504, 823 A.2d 752 (2003) (quotations omitted).
  • Rallis v. Demoulas Super Markets, Inc. 977 A.2d 527 N.H. 2009
    “The doctrine of stare decisis demands respect in a society governed by the rule of law, for when governing legal standards are open to revision in every case, deciding eases becomes a mere exercise of judicial will with arbitrary and unpredictable results.” Jacobs v. Director, N.H. Div. of Motor Vehicles, 149 N.H. 502, 504 (2003) (quotations omitted).
  • State v. Duran 960 A.2d 697 N.H. 2008
    “The doctrine of stare decisis demands respect in a society governed by the rule of law, for when governing legal standards are open to revision in every case, deciding cases becomes a mere exercise of judicial will with arbitrary and unpredictable results.” Jacobs v. Director, N.H. Div. of Motor Vehicles, 149 N.H. 502, 504 (2003) (quotation omitted).
  • Alonzi v. Northeast Generation Services Co. 940 A.2d 1153 N.H. 2008
    “The doctrine of stare decisis demands respect in a society governed by the rule of law, for when governing legal standards are open to revision in every case, deciding cases becomes a mere exercise *660 of judicial will with arbitrary and unpredictable results.” Jacobs v. Director, N.H. Div. of Motor Vehicles, 149 N.H. 502, 504 (2003) (quotations omitted).
  • Community Resources for Justice, Inc. v. City of Manchester 917 A.2d 707 N.H. 2007
    Jacobs v. Director, N.H. Div. of Motor Vehicles, 149 N.H. 502, 505 (2003); Planned Parenthood of Southeastern PA.
  • State v. Holmes 920 A.2d 632 N.H. 2007
    Jacobs v. Director, N.H. Div. of Motor Vehicles, 149 N.H. 502, 505 (2003); Casey, 505 U.S. at 854-55.
  • Appeal of Kaplan 893 A.2d 669 N.H. 2006
    Jacobs v. Director, N.H. Div. of Motor Vehicles, 149 N.H. 502, 504-05 (2003) (setting forth factors that guide our judgment when asked to overrule prior holding).
  • State v. Fernandez 876 A.2d 221 N.H. 2005
    Jacobs v. Director, N.H. Div. of Motor Vehicles, 149 N.H. 502, 504-05 (2003).
  • In re Estate of Treloar 859 A.2d 1162 N.H. 2004
    We decline the petitioner’s invitation to overrule In re Estate of Came absent any argument that this decision has “come to be seen so clearly as error that its enforcement was for that very reason doomed.” Jacobs v. Director, N.H. Div. of Motor Vehicles, 149 N.H. 502, 504-05 (2003) (quotation omitted).
  • Saviano v. Director, N.H. Division of Motor Vehicles 855 A.2d 1278 N.H. 2004
    RSA 263:75, II (Supp. 2003); Jacobs v. Director, N.H. Div. of Motor Vehicles, 149 N.H. 502, 503 (2003).
  • In re Huston 840 A.2d 773 N.H. 2003
    Jacobs v. Director, N.H. Div. of Motor Vehicles, 149 N.H. 502, 504-05 (2003).