Cited by
Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Pennelli v. Town of Pelham, 807 A.2d 1256.
-
Sullyville, LLC v. Town of Carroll
N.H. 2021
The Trainors’ statutory argument ignores not only the plain and unambiguous language of the statute, but also the basic rule of statutory construction that “all of the words of a statute must be given effect and that the legislature is presumed not to have used superfluous or redundant words.” Pennelli v. Town of Pelham, 148 N.H. 365, 367-68 (2002) (quotation omitted).
-
Appeal of City of Nashua
68 A.3d 288
N.H. 2013
Pennelli v. Town of Pelham, 148 N.H. 365, 366 (2002) (quotations and citations omitted).
-
State v. Guay
62 A.3d 831
N.H. 2013
Pennelli v. Town of Pelham, 148 N.H. 365, 367-80 (2002) (“Basic statutory construction rules require that all of the words of a statute must be given effect and that the legislature is presumed not to have used superfluous or redundant words.” (quotation omitted)).
-
New Hampshire Independent Pharmacy Ass'n v. New Hampshire Insurance Department
58 A.3d 680
N.H. 2012
Pennelli v. Town of Pelham, 148 N.H. 365, 368 (2002) (“We do not consider legislative history to construe a statute..
-
State v. White
58 A.3d 643
N.H. 2012
Pennelli v. Town of Pelham, 148 N.H. 365, 367-68 (2002) (“Basic statutory construction rules require that all of the words of a statute must be given effect and that the legislature is presumed not to have used superfluous or redundant words.” (quotation omitted)).
-
North Country Environmental Services v. State
943 A.2d 786
N.H. 2008
Pennelli v. Town of Pelham, 148 N.H. 365, 366 (2002).
-
Vector Marketing Corp. v. New Hampshire Department of Revenue Administration
942 A.2d 1261
N.H. 2008
Pennelli v. Town of Pelham, 148 N.H. 365, 368 (2002); KOCH, supra § 11.26, at 136 (in interpreting administrative rules, court may look to regulatory history and canons of statutory construction).
-
In Re Appeal of Kat Paw Acres Trust
937 A.2d 925
N.H. 2007
“As we examine the language, we do not merely look at isolated words or phrases, but instead we consider the statute as a whole.” Pennelli v. Town of Pelham, 148 N.H. 365, 366 (2002) (quotation omitted).
-
Formula Development Corp. v. Town of Chester
934 A.2d 504
N.H. 2007
Pennelli v. Town of Pelham, 148 N.H. 365, 366 (2002).
-
State v. Balukas
924 A.2d 381
N.H. 2007
Pennelli v. Town of Pelham, 148 N.H. 365, 368 (2002).
-
Porter v. Town of Sandwich
891 A.2d 521
N.H. 2006
Pennelli v. Town of Pelham, 148 N.H. 365, 366 (2002).
-
State v. Pierce
887 A.2d 132
N.H. 2005
Pennelli v. Town of Pelham, 148 N.H. 365, 367-68 (2002).
-
Rymes Heating Oils, Inc. v. Commissioner
862 A.2d 49
N.H. 2004
Pennelli v. Town of Pelham, 148 N.H. 365, 366 (2002).
-
In re Goffstown Education Support Staff
846 A.2d 1179
N.H. 2004
Pennelli v. Town of Pelham, 148 N.H. 365, 368-69 (2002).
-
Motion Motors, Inc. v. Berwick
846 A.2d 1156
N.H. 2004
Pennelli v. Town of Pelham, 148 N.H. 365, 366 (2002).
-
North Country Environmental Services, Inc. v. Town of Bethlehem
843 A.2d 949
N.H. 2004
Pennelli v. Town of Pelham, 148 N.H. 365, 368-69 (2002).
-
Nilsson v. Bierman
839 A.2d 25
N.H. 2003
construe them so that they do not contradict each other, and so that they will lead to reasonable results and effectuate the legislative purpose of the statute.” Pennelli v. Town of Pelham, 148 N.H. 365, 366 (2002) (quotation omitted).
-
Sanborn Regional School District v. Budget Committee
836 A.2d 768
N.H. 2003
construe them so that they do not contradict each other, and so that they will lead to reasonable results and effectuate the legislative purpose of the statute.” Pennelli v. Town of Pelham, 148 N.H. 365, 366 (2002) (quotation omitted).
-
State v. Boulais
834 A.2d 380
N.H. 2003
Pennelli v. Town of Pelham, 148 N.H. 365, 366 (2002).
-
In re Juvenile 2003-189
834 A.2d 271
N.H. 2003
Pennelli v. Town of Pelham, 148 N.H. 365, 366 (2002).
-
Town of Ossipee v. Whittier Lifts Trust
827 A.2d 989
N.H. 2003
Pennelli v. Town of Pelham, 148 N.H. 365, 368 (2002).
-
Franklin Lodge v. Marcoux
825 A.2d 480
N.H. 2003
Pennelli v. Town of Pelham, 148 N.H. 365, 366 (2002).
-
Comeau v. Vergato
823 A.2d 764
N.H. 2003
Pennelli v. Town of Pelham, 148 N.H. 365, 367-68 (2002) (“the legislature is presumed not to have used superfluous or redundant words”).