Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Pennelli v. Town of Pelham, 807 A.2d 1256.

23 citing documents.

  • Sullyville, LLC v. Town of Carroll N.H. 2021
    The Trainors’ statutory argument ignores not only the plain and unambiguous language of the statute, but also the basic rule of statutory construction that “all of the words of a statute must be given effect and that the legislature is presumed not to have used superfluous or redundant words.” Pennelli v. Town of Pelham, 148 N.H. 365, 367-68 (2002) (quotation omitted).
  • Appeal of City of Nashua 68 A.3d 288 N.H. 2013
    Pennelli v. Town of Pelham, 148 N.H. 365, 366 (2002) (quotations and citations omitted).
  • State v. Guay 62 A.3d 831 N.H. 2013
    Pennelli v. Town of Pelham, 148 N.H. 365, 367-80 (2002) (“Basic statutory construction rules require that all of the words of a statute must be given effect and that the legislature is presumed not to have used superfluous or redundant words.” (quotation omitted)).
  • New Hampshire Independent Pharmacy Ass'n v. New Hampshire Insurance Department 58 A.3d 680 N.H. 2012
    Pennelli v. Town of Pelham, 148 N.H. 365, 368 (2002) (“We do not consider legislative history to construe a statute..
  • State v. White 58 A.3d 643 N.H. 2012
    Pennelli v. Town of Pelham, 148 N.H. 365, 367-68 (2002) (“Basic statutory construction rules require that all of the words of a statute must be given effect and that the legislature is presumed not to have used superfluous or redundant words.” (quotation omitted)).
  • North Country Environmental Services v. State 943 A.2d 786 N.H. 2008
    Pennelli v. Town of Pelham, 148 N.H. 365, 366 (2002).
  • Vector Marketing Corp. v. New Hampshire Department of Revenue Administration 942 A.2d 1261 N.H. 2008
    Pennelli v. Town of Pelham, 148 N.H. 365, 368 (2002); KOCH, supra § 11.26, at 136 (in interpreting administrative rules, court may look to regulatory history and canons of statutory construction).
  • In Re Appeal of Kat Paw Acres Trust 937 A.2d 925 N.H. 2007
    “As we examine the language, we do not merely look at isolated words or phrases, but instead we consider the statute as a whole.” Pennelli v. Town of Pelham, 148 N.H. 365, 366 (2002) (quotation omitted).
  • Formula Development Corp. v. Town of Chester 934 A.2d 504 N.H. 2007
    Pennelli v. Town of Pelham, 148 N.H. 365, 366 (2002).
  • State v. Balukas 924 A.2d 381 N.H. 2007
    Pennelli v. Town of Pelham, 148 N.H. 365, 368 (2002).
  • Porter v. Town of Sandwich 891 A.2d 521 N.H. 2006
    Pennelli v. Town of Pelham, 148 N.H. 365, 366 (2002).
  • State v. Pierce 887 A.2d 132 N.H. 2005
    Pennelli v. Town of Pelham, 148 N.H. 365, 367-68 (2002).
  • Rymes Heating Oils, Inc. v. Commissioner 862 A.2d 49 N.H. 2004
    Pennelli v. Town of Pelham, 148 N.H. 365, 366 (2002).
  • In re Goffstown Education Support Staff 846 A.2d 1179 N.H. 2004
    Pennelli v. Town of Pelham, 148 N.H. 365, 368-69 (2002).
  • Motion Motors, Inc. v. Berwick 846 A.2d 1156 N.H. 2004
    Pennelli v. Town of Pelham, 148 N.H. 365, 366 (2002).
  • North Country Environmental Services, Inc. v. Town of Bethlehem 843 A.2d 949 N.H. 2004
    Pennelli v. Town of Pelham, 148 N.H. 365, 368-69 (2002).
  • Nilsson v. Bierman 839 A.2d 25 N.H. 2003
    construe them so that they do not contradict each other, and so that they will lead to reasonable results and effectuate the legislative purpose of the statute.” Pennelli v. Town of Pelham, 148 N.H. 365, 366 (2002) (quotation omitted).
  • Sanborn Regional School District v. Budget Committee 836 A.2d 768 N.H. 2003
    construe them so that they do not contradict each other, and so that they will lead to reasonable results and effectuate the legislative purpose of the statute.” Pennelli v. Town of Pelham, 148 N.H. 365, 366 (2002) (quotation omitted).
  • State v. Boulais 834 A.2d 380 N.H. 2003
    Pennelli v. Town of Pelham, 148 N.H. 365, 366 (2002).
  • In re Juvenile 2003-189 834 A.2d 271 N.H. 2003
    Pennelli v. Town of Pelham, 148 N.H. 365, 366 (2002).
  • Town of Ossipee v. Whittier Lifts Trust 827 A.2d 989 N.H. 2003
    Pennelli v. Town of Pelham, 148 N.H. 365, 368 (2002).
  • Franklin Lodge v. Marcoux 825 A.2d 480 N.H. 2003
    Pennelli v. Town of Pelham, 148 N.H. 365, 366 (2002).
  • Comeau v. Vergato 823 A.2d 764 N.H. 2003
    Pennelli v. Town of Pelham, 148 N.H. 365, 367-68 (2002) (“the legislature is presumed not to have used superfluous or redundant words”).