Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Winnacunnet Cooperative School District v. Town of Seabrook, 809 A.2d 1270.

15 citing documents.

In re J.W. 213 A.3d 853 N.H. 2019
David A. Hodges, Jr. & a. v. Alan Johnson & a. 177 A.3d 86 N.H. 2017
Thomas Reid v. New Hampshire Attorney General 169 N.H. 509 N.H. 2016
v. Town of Seabrook, 148 N.H. 519, 525-26 (2002) (noting that “[w]hen construing a statute, we must give effect to all words in [the] statute and presume that the legislature did not enact superfluous or redundant words”); cf. Shapiro v. U.S. Dept. of Justice, 153 F. Supp. 3d 253, 280 (D.D.C.
Appeal of Carlos Marti 145 A.3d 133 N.H. 2016
Richard Holt & a. v. Gary Keer & a. Gary Keer & a. v. Richard Holt & a. 167 N.H. 232 N.H. 2015
v. Town of Seabrook, 148 N.H. 519, 525-26 (2002) (“When construing a statute, we must give effect to all words in a statute and presume that the legislature did not enact superfluous or redundant words.”).
David Montenegro v. New Hampshire Division of Motor Vehicles 93 A.3d 290 N.H. 2014
v. Town of Seabrook, 148 N.H. 519, 525-26 (2002) (“When construing a statute, we must give effect to all words in a statute and presume that the legislature did not enact superfluous or redundant words.”).
New Hampshire Resident Ltd. Partners v. New Hampshire Department of Revenue Administration 27 A.3d 829 N.H. 2011
v. Town of Seabrook, 148 N.H. 519, 525-26 (2002) (“When construing a statute [or regulation], we must give effect to all words in a statute and presume that the legislature [or administrative agency] did not enact superfluous or redundant words”).
Smith v. City of Franklin 987 A.2d 127 N.H. 2010
Petition of State 986 A.2d 592 N.H. 2009
GUILDHALL SAND & GRAVEL, LLC v. Town of Goshen 929 A.2d 199 N.H. 2007
v. Town of Seabrook, 148 N.H. 519, 525-26 (2002) (“When construing a statute, we must give effect to all words in a statute and presume that the legislature did not enact superfluous or redundant words.”).
In Re Albert 922 A.2d 643 N.H. 2007
v. Town of Seabrook, 148 N.H. 519, 525-26 (2002) (“When construing a statute, we must give effect to all words in a statute and presume that the legislature did not enact superfluous or redundant words.”); cf. In the Matter of Jerome & Jerome, 150 N.H. 626, 629 (2004) (holding that legislature’s use of the term “annuities,” without qualification
New Hampshire Motor Transport Ass'n Employee Benefit Trust v. New Hampshire Insurance Guaranty Ass'n 914 A.2d 812 N.H. 2006
v. Town of Seabrook, 148 N.H. 519, 525-26 (2002) (“When construing a statute, we must give effect to all words in a statute and presume that the legislature did not enact superfluous or redundant words.”).
Town of Acworth v. Fall Mountain Regional School District 857 A.2d 1265 N.H. 2004
Sanborn Regional School District v. Budget Committee 836 A.2d 768 N.H. 2003
Furbush v. McKittrick 821 A.2d 1126 N.H. 2003
v. Town of Seabrook, 148 N.H. 519, 524 (2002) (quotation omitted).