Cited by

In the Matter of Gordon and Gordon, 147 N.H. 693, 700 (2002) (declining to address party’s arguments because the case was remanded for further findings).

In the Matter of Gordon and Gordon, 147 N.H. 693, 699-700 (2002) (declining to address party’s arguments because we remanded for further findings).

In the Matter of Gordon and Gordon, 147 N.H. 693, 700 (2002).

at 804 (upholding an alimony award of $2,850 for eight years where obligor earned $14,000 per month); see also In the Matter of Gordon and Gordon, 147 N.H. 693, 699 (2002) (affirming alimony award of $2,000 per month for the first two years after divorce and $1,000 per month for the following three years when husband earned approximately $13,000 monthly).

In the Matter of Gordon and Gordon, 147 N.H. 693, 697 (2002) (marital property under RSA 458:16-a, I, includes “any property acquired up to the date of a decree of legal separation or divorce” (quotation omitted)); see also RSA 458:16-a, I (“all tangible and intangible property and assets, real or personal, belonging to either or both parties,” is subject to equitab

Forcier, 152 N.H. at 465-66; In the Matter of Gordon and Gordon, 147 N.H. 693, 699-700 (2002).

at the petitioner’s lump sum workers’ compensation award, received one day before petitioner filed for divorce, was marital property); In the Matter of Nyhan and Nyhan, 147 N.H. 768, 770-71 (2002) (affirming the trial court’s valuation of contributions made to retirement accounts as of the date of the final hearing, which took place before the decree was issued); In the Matter of Gordon & Gordon, 147 N.H. 693, 696-97 (2002) (concluding that trial court did not err in finding that husband’s contr

In the Matter of Forcier & Mueller, 152 N.H. 463, 465-66 (2005); In the Matter of Gordon and Gordon, 147 N.H. 693, 699-700 (2002); Giles v. Giles, 136 N.H. 540, 545 (1992).

In the Matter of Gordon and Gordon, 147 N.H. 693, 699 (2002) (affirming alimony award of $2,000 per month for the first two years after divorce and $1,000 per month for the following three years when husband earned approximately $13,000 monthly).

of Adjustment, 155 N.H. 307, 311-12 (2007) (upholding trial court’s decision to vacate zoning board decision and remand for the board to clarify its decision); In the Matter of Gordon and Gordon, 147 N.H. 693, 700 (2002) (directing trial court on remand to make specific findings to facilitate appellate review).

In the Matter of Gordon and Gordon, 147 N.H. 693, 700 (2002) (directing trial court on remand to make specific findings to facilitate appellate review).

record the clarification of an allegation in the interest of narrowing the issues to only those that are contested, cf. In re Ronnie Prime, 120 N.H. 849, 850 (1980) (“As long as a judge maintains his impartiality, he has the right to question a witness in order to clarify the testimony.”), and facilitating meaningful judicial review of its disposition, see In the Matter of Gordon and Gordon, 147 N.H. 693, 700 (2002) (recognizing for purposes of child support award that, although no statute expre

In the Matter of Gordon & Gordon, 147 N.H. 693, 700 (2002).

In the Matter of Gordon and Gordon, 147 N.H. 693, 695-96 (2002).

In the Matter of Gordon and Gordon, 147 N.H. 693 (2002).