DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Minuteman, LLC v. Microsoft Corp., 795 A.2d 833.

13 citing documents.

  • LaChance v. United States Smokeless Tobacco Co. 931 A.2d 571 N.H. 2007
    priced consumer product.” Over the course of litigating their case in superior court, the plaintiffs moved to certify “a class of similarly situated New Hampshire purchasers of moist snuff smokeless tobacco.” For their part, the defendants moved for judgment on the pleadings, arguing, among other things, that the plaintiffs’ claims were barred by our decision in Minuteman, LLC v. Microsoft Corp., 147 N.H. 634 (2002).
  • Cloutier v. City of Berlin 907 A.2d 955 N.H. 2006
    Minuteman, LLC v. Microsoft Corp., 147 N.H. 634, 641-42 (2002).
  • DeBenedetto v. CLD Consulting Engineers, Inc. 903 A.2d 969 N.H. 2006
    Minuteman, LLC v. Microsoft Corp., 147 N.H. 634, 640 (2002).
  • State v. City of Dover 891 A.2d 524 N.H. 2006
    “The right to a remedy, however, is not a fundamental right, but is relative and does not prohibit all impairments of the right of access.” Minuteman, LLC v. Microsoft Corp., 147 N.H. 634, 640 (2002) (quotation omitted).
  • In re Goffstown Education Support Staff 846 A.2d 1179 N.H. 2004
    The purpose of this provision “is to make civil remedies readily available, and to guard against arbitrary and discriminatory infringements on access to courts.” Minuteman, LLC v. Microsoft Corp., 147 N.H. 634, 640 (2002) (quotation omitted).
  • Blackthorne Group, Inc. v. Pines of Newmarket, Inc. 848 A.2d 725 N.H. 2004
    Minutemam, LLC v. Microsoft Corp., 147 N.H. 634, 636 (2002).
  • Nilsson v. Bierman 839 A.2d 25 N.H. 2003
    Minuteman, LLC v. Microsoft Corp., 147 N.H. 634, 641-42 (2002).
  • State v. Melvin 834 A.2d 247 N.H. 2003
    Although the defendant argues that these hypothetical defendants deserve “greater punishment” than he does, this is a matter of public policy reserved for the legislature, not for us. See Minuteman, LLC v. Microsoft Corp., 147 N.H. 634, 641-42 (2002).
  • Bunker's Glass Co. v. PILKINGTON, PLC 75 P.3d 99 Ariz. 2003
  • Michael R. Gray, M.D. v. Philip Morris Usa Ariz. 2003
  • In re Plaisted 824 A.2d 148 N.H. 2003
    Minuteman, LLC v. Microsoft Corp., 147 N.H. 634, 641-42 (2002).
  • Graves v. Estabrook 818 A.2d 1255 N.H. 2003
    Minuteman, LLC v. Microsoft Corp., 147 N.H. 634, 636 (2002).
  • Remsburg v. Docusearch, Inc. 816 A.2d 1001 N.H. 2003
    “[W]e will not consider what the legislature might have said or add words that the legislature did not include.” Minuteman, LLC v. Microsoft Corp., 147 N.H. 634, 636 (2002) (quotation omitted).