DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Brzica v. Trustees of Dartmouth College, 791 A.2d 990.

14 citing documents.

  • Steven P. Bureau v. Adam Bernstein N.H. 2020
    “In order to withstand a motion to dismiss, the plaintiff must specify the essential details of the fraud, and specifically allege the facts of the defendant’s fraudulent actions.” Brzica v. Trustees of Dartmouth College, 147 N.H. 443, 449 (2002) (quotation omitted).
  • Petition of Steven J. Rubenzer, Ph.D., ABPP N.H. 2015
    Thus, “[w]e may not overturn the trial court’s decision unless we are persuaded that the court’s exercise of discretion is unsustainable.” Brzica v. Trustees of Dartmouth College, 147 N.H. 443, 446 (2002).
  • Thomas N.T. Mullen & a. v. Public Service Company of New Hampshire & a. N.H. 2015
    Brzica v. Trustees of Dartmouth College, 147 N.H. 443, 450 (2002) (holding plaintiffs’ broad allegation that at some time defendant trustees made and concealed decision failed to meet requirement that petition specify essential details of fraud).
  • In the Matter of Marcus J. Hampers and Kristin C. Hampers 166 N.H. 422 N.H. 2014
    “The essence of the doctrine of res judicata is that a final judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction is conclusive upon the parties in a subsequent litigation involving the same cause of action,” Brzica v. Trustees of Dartmouth College, 147 N.H. 443, 454 (2002) (quotation omitted), “even though the plaintiff is prepared in the second action to present evidence or grounds or theories of the case not presented in the first action.” Id.
  • Lamprey v. Britton Construction, Inc. 37 A.3d 359 N.H. 2012
    It is not sufficient for the plaintiff merely to allege fraud in general terms.” Brzica v. Trustees of Dartmouth College, 147 N.H. 443, 449 (2002) (quotation omitted).
  • Brooks v. Trustees of Dartmouth College 20 A.3d 890 N.H. 2011
    Brzica v. Trustees of Dartmouth College, 147 N.H. 443, 452 (2002).
  • Green Mountain Realty Corp. v. Fifth Estate Tower, LLC 13 A.3d 123 N.H. 2010
    “Fraudulent or deceptive conduct can be actionable under the [CPA] only if it occurs in a business setting involving the advertising or sale of a commodity or service as part of the day-to-day business of the defendant.” Brzica v. Trustees of Dartmouth College, 147 N.H. 443, 451 (2002).
  • LaMarche v. McCarthy 965 A.2d 992 N.H. 2008
    Superior Court Rule 139 states, in pertinent part: “Any person shown to be interested may become a party to any proceeding in equity on his petition briefly setting forth his relation to the cause.” “The right of a party to intervene in pending litigation in this state has been rather freely allowed as a matter of practice.” Brzica v. Trustees of Dartmouth College, 147 N.H. 443, 446 (2002) (quotation omitted).
  • Sleeper v. HOBAN FAMILY PARTNERSHIP 955 A.2d 879 N.H. 2008
    Brzica v. Trustees of Dartmouth College, 147 N.H. 443, 455-56 (2002).
  • Clark & Lavey Ben. v. Ed. Dev. Center 949 A.2d 133 N.H. 2008
    Brzica v. Trustees of Dartmouth College, 147 N.H. 443, 447, 791 A.2d 990 (2002).
  • Clark & Lavey Benefits Solutions, Inc. v. Education Development Center, Inc. 157 N.H. 220 N.H. 2008
    Brzica v. Trustees of Dartmouth College, 147 N.H. 443, 447 (2002).
  • In re Juvenile 2004-637 888 A.2d 422 N.H. 2005
    Brzica v. Trustees of Dartmouth College, 147 N.H. 443, 454 (2002).
  • Osman v. Gagnon 876 A.2d 193 N.H. 2005
    Brzica v. Trustees of Dartmouth College, 147 N.H. 443, 454 (2002).
  • North Country Environmental Services, Inc. v. Town of Bethlehem 843 A.2d 949 N.H. 2004
    Brzica v. Trustees of Dartmouth College, 147 N.H. 443, 454 (2002).